Connect with us

China

Will COVID-19 Remake the World? A Detailed Expert analysis

Published

on

Crises come in two variants: those for which we could not have prepared, because no one had anticipated them, and those for which we should have been prepared, because they were in fact expected. COVID-19 is in the latter category, no matter what US President Donald Trump says to avoid responsibility for the unfolding catastrophe. Even though the coronavirus itself is new and the timing of the current outbreak could not have been predicted, it was well recognized by experts that a pandemic of this type was likely.

SARS, MERS, H1N1, Ebola, and other outbreaks had provided ample warning. Fifteen years ago, the World Health Organization revised and upgraded the global framework for responding to outbreaks, trying to fix perceived shortcomings in the global response experienced during the SARS outbreak in 2003.

In 2016, the World Bank launched a Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility to provide assistance to low-income countries in the face of cross-border health crises. Most glaringly, just a few months before COVID-19 emerged in Wuhan, China, a US government report cautioned the Trump administration about the likelihood of a flu pandemic on the scale of the influenza epidemic a hundred years ago, which killed an estimated 50 million people worldwide.

No one should expect the pandemic to alter – much less reverse – tendencies that were evident before the crisis. Neoliberalism will continue its slow death, populist autocrats will become even more authoritarian, and the left will continue to struggle to devise a program that appeals to a majority of voters.

Just like climate change, COVID-19 was a crisis waiting to happen. The response in the United States has been particularly disastrous. Trump downplayed the severity of the crisis for weeks. By the time infections and hospitalizations began to soar, the country found itself severely short of test kits, masks, ventilators, and other medical supplies.

ALSO READ:   Trump-Xi Truce Won’t Save the Dollar from the Yuan

The US did not request test kits made available by the WHO, and failed to produce reliable tests early on. Trump declined to use his authority to requisition medical supplies from private producers, forcing hospitals and state authorities to scramble and compete against one another to secure supplies.

Delays in testing and lockdowns have been costly in Europe as well, with Italy, Spain, France, and the United Kingdom paying a high price. Some countries in East Asia have responded a lot better. South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong appear to have controlled the spread of the disease through a combination of testing, tracing, and strict quarantine policies.

Interesting contrasts have emerged within countries as well. In northern Italy, Veneto has done much better than nearby Lombardy, largely owing to more comprehensive testing and earlier imposition of travel restrictions. In the US, the neighboring states of Kentucky and Tennessee reported their first cases of COVID-19 within a day of each other. By the end of March, Kentucky had only a quarter of the number of cases as Tennessee, because the state acted much more quickly to declare a state of emergency and close down public accommodations.

For the most part, though, the crisis has played out in ways that could have been anticipated from the prevailing nature of governance in different countries. Trump’s incompetent, bumbling, self-aggrandizing approach to managing the crisis could not have been a surprise, as lethal as it has been. Likewise, Brazil’s equally vain and mercurial president, Jair Bolsonaro, has, true to form, continued to downplay the risks.

On the other hand, it should come as no surprise that governments have responded faster and more effectively where they still command significant public trust, such as in South Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan.

ALSO READ:   World battling Against Covid-19 Pandemic

China’s response was typically Chinese: suppression of information about the prevalence of the virus, a high degree of social control, and a massive mobilization of resources once the threat became clear. Turkmenistan has banned the word “coronavirus,” as well as the use of masks in public. Hungary’s Viktor Orbán has capitalized on the crisis by tightening his grip on power, by disbanding parliament after giving himself emergency powers without time limit.

The crisis seems to have thrown the dominant characteristics of each country’s politics into sharper relief. Countries have in effect become exaggerated versions of themselves. This suggests that the crisis may turn out to be less of a watershed in global politics and economics than many have argued. Rather than putting the world on a significantly different trajectory, it is likely to intensify and entrench already-existing trends.

Momentous events such as the current crisis engender their own “confirmation bias”: we are likely to see in the COVID-19 debacle an affirmation of our own worldview. And we may perceive incipient signs of a future economic and political order we have long wished for.

So, those who want more government and public goods will have plenty of reason to think the crisis justifies their belief. And those who are skeptical of government and decry its incompetence will also find their prior views confirmed. Those who want more global governance will make the case that a stronger international public-regime health could have reduced the costs of the pandemic.

And those who seek stronger nation-states will point to the many ways in which the WHO seem to have mismanaged its response (for example, by taking China’s official claims at face value, opposing travel bans, and arguing against masks).

ALSO READ:   Air Canada to temporarily lay off 16,500 staff due to COVID-19 crisis

Via __PS


Discover more from Startups Pro,Inc

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

China

CXMT IPO: How a 466% Debut Made China’s Chipmaker Worth More Than ICBC

Published

on

On its first day of trading on Shanghai’s STAR Market, ChangXin Memory Technologies — known globally as CXMT — did something few companies of any nationality have ever managed: it became more valuable than one of its country’s largest state-owned banks within hours of going public. Shares surged approximately 466% above their IPO price, closing the day with a market capitalization of roughly RMB 3.3 trillion — enough to overtake Industrial and Commercial Bank of China as the most valuable China-listed company, with more than RMB 140 billion of shares changing hands during the session alone.

The Numbers Behind the Debut

CXMT’s offering was not a marginal listing padded by speculative retail enthusiasm — it was Asia’s largest IPO of 2026 by a wide margin, and mainland China’s second-largest ever, trailing only Agricultural Bank of China’s $22.1 billion 2010 offering. The Hefei-based chipmaker raised 57.92 billion yuan, roughly $8.6 billion, pricing shares at 8.66 yuan before they closed the debut session at 49 yuan. Based on 2025 sales figures cited in its own IPO prospectus, CXMT held a 7.67% share of the global DRAM memory-chip market — positioning it as a genuine, if still distant, challenger to the three companies that have long dominated the sector: Samsung Electronics, SK Hynix, and Micron Technology.

The company’s underlying financials help explain investor enthusiasm. CXMT’s revenue reached 50.8 billion yuan, approximately $7.5 billion, in the first quarter of 2026 alone — a year-on-year increase of more than 700%, driven by surging AI-related demand for the DRAM chips used across AI servers, personal computers, smartphones, and automotive electronics.

ALSO READ:   Knee-deep in Covid-19, our hospitals need steady supplies of PPEs, sanitisers and adequate staff

Why This Listing Is a Geopolitical Story, Not Just a Financial One

Brookings Institution fellow Kyle Chan, an expert in China’s technology policy, framed CXMT’s significance in explicitly strategic terms, describing the company as playing a critical role in China’s AI push, particularly in the face of US export controls. That framing matters because of what US restrictions specifically target: Washington’s export-control regime has barred China from importing high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips — a high-performance category of DRAM that is critical for training and running advanced AI models. CXMT’s expansion is, in effect, China’s most concrete industrial answer to that restriction: building domestic capacity in the exact chip category the US has tried hardest to keep out of Chinese hands.

The timing also matters. CXMT’s Shanghai debut followed closely behind South Korea’s SK Hynix completing a $26.5 billion Nasdaq IPO, meaning global capital markets absorbed two of the memory-chip industry’s largest-ever public offerings within weeks of each other — a signal of just how central memory chips have become to the broader AI infrastructure investment cycle reshaping capital markets globally in 2026.

The Cash-Drain Concern

Not every signal ahead of the listing was unambiguously bullish. In the days before the debut, CXMT’s looming IPO stoked fears of a broader cash drain from Chinese equities, as investors pulled capital from other Chinese tech holdings to fund participation in what was widely expected to be an oversubscribed offering — a dynamic that contributed to a pullback in Chinese technology shares in the sessions immediately preceding the listing.

Analysts have also flagged sustainability questions about the memory sector’s current earnings profile more broadly. One market strategist cautioned that the industry may be nearing a short-term peak in memory-cycle sentiment, warning that the exceptional margins and profitability currently visible across the DRAM sector are unlikely to persist through a full cycle and will eventually normalize — a caution that applies to CXMT’s own trajectory as much as to its global peers, even as the company’s near-term revenue growth remains extraordinary.

ALSO READ:   Implications of the oil price crash on the Arab world

What Comes Next for China’s Chip Ambitions

CXMT has stated its IPO proceeds will be deployed primarily toward mass production of memory wafers and expanded R&D — a direct, capital-intensive bet on scaling output rather than diversifying into adjacent businesses. For China’s broader semiconductor self-sufficiency strategy, CXMT’s success (or eventual stumble) will serve as a bellwether for whether domestic Chinese chipmakers can translate state-backed capital access and captive domestic demand into genuine competitiveness against entrenched South Korean and American incumbents — the same question underlying Beijing’s parallel investments across the semiconductor supply chain, from lithography equipment to rare-earth-dependent chip materials.

The Bottom Line

CXMT’s 466% debut is simultaneously a financial-markets story, an AI-infrastructure story, and a geopolitics story — and the three are now inseparable. For investors and policymakers tracking the broader US-China technology competition, CXMT’s post-IPO performance over the coming quarters will offer one of the clearest available signals of how effectively Chinese state-directed capital can compensate for continued exclusion from the most advanced Western and allied semiconductor technology.


Discover more from Startups Pro,Inc

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Analysis

The Great Launch Rush: How China’s Rocket IPO Surge Is Reshaping the Global Space Race

Published

on

The launchpad is no longer just a stretch of concrete in Florida or Kazakhstan. It has expanded to include the trading floors of Shanghai and Shenzhen. In a coordinated financial maneuver as precise as an orbital insertion burn, China is propelling its top private rocket start-ups into the public markets. This month, the IPO plans for four major firms—LandSpace, i-Space, CAS Space, and Space Pioneer—have advanced with bureaucratic swiftness. It’s a move that signals a profound shift: the 21st-century space race will be won not just by engineers, but by capital markets. As Beijing systematically builds its commercial space arsenal to counter Elon Musk’s SpaceX, we are witnessing the financialization of the final frontier.

The IPO Quartet: A Strategic Unfolding in Real Time

This is not a trickle of investment but a flood. The Shanghai Stock Exchange’s recent interrogation of LandSpace Technology’s application is the linchpin, advancing a plan to raise 7.5 billion yuan (US$1 billion). They are not alone. i-Space has issued a counselling update, CAS Space passed a key review, and Space Pioneer published its first guidance report—all within a critical seven-day window in January 2025.

CompanyPlanned Raise (Est.)Flagship Vehicle / TechCurrent IPO Stage (Jan 2025)Strategic Angle
LandSpace¥7.5 Bn (~$1Bn)*Zhuque-3* (Reusable Methalox)SSE Star Market ReviewChina’s direct answer to SpaceX’s Falcon 9 reuse.
i-SpaceTo be confirmedHyperbola seriesCounselling PhaseEarly private pioneer, focusing on small-lift reliability.
CAS SpaceTo be confirmed*Lijian-1* (Solid)Review PassedSpin-off from Chinese Academy of Sciences, blending state R&D with private agility.
Space PioneerTo be confirmed*Tianlong-3* (Kerosene)Guidance PublishedAims to be first private firm to reach orbit with a liquid rocket.

The message is clear. As noted in a Financial Times analysis of state-guided industry, China is executing a “cluster” strategy, fostering internal competition within a protected ecosystem to produce a national champion. These IPOs provide the war chest not just for R&D, but for scaling manufacturing—a key lesson learned from watching SpaceX.

ALSO READ:   Implications of the oil price crash on the Arab world

State Capitalism Meets the Final Frontier

To view this solely through a lens of Western-style venture capitalism is to misunderstand the engine of China’s space ambition. This IPO wave is a masterclass in the synergy between state direction and private market discipline. Beijing’s “China Aerospace 2030” goals and the mega-constellation project Guowang (a direct competitor to Starlink) create a guaranteed, sovereign demand pull. The government, as the primary customer, de-risks the initial market for these companies, allowing them to scale at a pace unimaginable in a purely commercial environment.

As a Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) report on space competition astutely observes, China’s model “leverages the full toolkit of national power—industrial policy, military-civil fusion, and strategic finance—to create a self-sustaining space ecosystem.” The IPOs on the tech-focused Star Market are a critical piece, moving the funding burden from state balance sheets to public investors, while retaining strategic oversight. This contrasts sharply with the U.S. model, where SpaceX and its rivals have been fueled primarily by private VC, corporate debt, and, in Musk’s case, the cash flow of a billionaire’s other ventures.

The Valuation Galaxy: Appetite, Hype, and Calculated Risk

Investor appetite appears voracious, driven by the siren song of the trillion-dollar space economy projected by firms like Morgan Stanley. The narrative is compelling: China has over 100 commercial space firms, a booming satellite manufacturing sector, and a national imperative to dominate low-Earth orbit. The IPO funds will be channeled into the holy grail of reuse—LandSpace’s goal to land and refly its Zhuque-3—and scaling launch rates to dozens per year.

ALSO READ:   PTA Supporting Efforts To Combat Corona Virus

Yet, risks orbit this sector like space debris. Overcapacity is a real threat, as four major firms and dozens of smaller ones vie for domestic launch contracts. Technical reliability remains unproven at SpaceX’s scale; a high-profile public failure post-IPO could shatter confidence. Furthermore, geopolitical tensions threaten supply chains and access to foreign components, pushing an already insulated market further into redundancy. As Reuters reported on China’s tech sector challenges, self-sufficiency is both a shield and a potential constraint on innovation.

The Long Game: Catching SpaceX or Carving a Niche?

The central question for analysts and investors alike: Is the goal to create a true, global SpaceX competitor, or a dominant national champion that secures the Chinese sphere of influence? The evidence points to the latter, at least for this decade.

While reusable rocket technology is the stated aim—with LandSpace targeting a first reuse by 2026—the immediate market is sovereign. The launch of the 13,000-satellite Guowang constellation will require hundreds of dedicated launches, a contract pool likely reserved for domestic providers. This creates a parallel “space silk road,” where Chinese rockets launch Chinese satellites for Chinese and partner-nation clients, largely decoupled from the Western market.

However, to dismiss this as merely a protected play is to underestimate Beijing’s long vision. By achieving cost parity through reuse and massive scale, China’s leading firm could, by the 2030s, emerge as a formidable low-cost competitor on the commercial international market, much as it did in solar panels and telecommunications infrastructure.

The Bottom Line: An Inflection Point, Not a Finish Line

This month’s IPO rush is not the culmination of China’s commercial space story, but the end of its first chapter. It marks the transition from venture-backed experimentation to publicly accountable scale-up. The capital influx will test whether these firms can evolve from innovative start-ups into industrially disciplined aerospace giants.

ALSO READ:   Wuhan lifts outbound travel restrictions

The global implications are stark. The United States and Europe now face a competitor whose space ambitions are underwritten not by the fleeting whims of market sentiment, but by the deep, strategic alignment of state policy, national security, and now, liquid public capital. The race for space dominance has entered a new, more financialized, and intensely more competitive phase. The countdown to a bipolar space order has well and truly begun.


Discover more from Startups Pro,Inc

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Analysis

The Leading Economic Giants of 2025: Fourth Quarter Insights as December Ends

Published

on

Introduction

This article provides a data-driven analysis of the leading economic giants of 2025, comparing nominal GDP, purchasing power parity (PPP), and growth trajectories. It integrates authentic statistics from the IMF, OECD, and Fitch Ratings, while embedding SEO-rich

United States – Still the Nominal Leader

The United States remains the world’s largest economy in nominal terms, with GDP estimated at $29 trillion in 2025. Growth has moderated to around 2%, reflecting a mature cycle but supported by robust consumer spending and AI-driven productivity gains.

  • Inflation: ~2.75%, easing from earlier highs.
  • Monetary Policy: The Federal Reserve has begun rate cuts, balancing inflation control with growth support.
  • Sectoral Strength: Technology, healthcare, and financial services continue to anchor resilience.

Despite China’s PPP dominance, the U.S. retains unmatched influence in global capital markets, innovation ecosystems, and reserve currency status.

China – Closing the Gap

China’s economy has expanded to nearly $26 trillion nominal GDP, with growth around 4.8% in 2025. On a PPP basis, China leads the world, outpacing the U.S. by an estimated Int. $10.4 trillion.

  • Exports: Strong performance in EVs, semiconductors, and renewable energy.
  • Domestic Demand: Rising middle-class consumption continues to drive growth.
  • Challenges: Property sector fragility and demographic headwinds remain.
ALSO READ:   Implications of the oil price crash on the Arab world

China’s ability to sustain growth above advanced economies underscores its role as a global GDP leader 2025, though questions linger about structural reforms.

India – The Rising Star

India has emerged as the fastest-growing major economy, with GDP growth near 6% in 2025. Its nominal GDP is projected at $4.8 trillion, positioning it to surpass Japan by 2026 and claim the fourth-largest spot globally.

  • Drivers: Digital economy expansion, infrastructure investment, and strong domestic demand.
  • Demographics: A youthful workforce contrasts sharply with aging populations in advanced economies.
  • Global Role: Increasing influence in supply chains, fintech, and renewable energy.

India’s trajectory exemplifies the emerging markets rise 2025, making it a focal point for investors and policymakers alike.

Germany – Europe’s Anchor

Germany solidified its position as the third-largest economy, overtaking Japan in 2023 and maintaining momentum in 2025. With GDP around $5.5 trillion, Germany anchors the Eurozone, which grew at 1.4% in 2025.

  • Industrial Strength: Automotive, engineering, and green technologies.
  • Policy Focus: Energy transition and fiscal discipline.
  • Resilience: Despite global headwinds, Germany’s export machine remains robust.

Germany’s role as Europe’s anchor highlights the Eurozone Q4 outlook, balancing stability with innovation.

Japan & Emerging Markets

Japan, once the world’s second-largest economy, has slipped to fifth place with GDP around $4.7 trillion. Growth remains sluggish (~1%), constrained by demographics and deflationary pressures.

Meanwhile, emerging markets such as Brazil, Indonesia, and Nigeria are showing resilience. Their collective growth underscores the global growth forecasts 2025, with commodity exports, digital adoption, and regional trade blocs driving momentum.

Comparative Data Table

CountryNominal GDP (2025 est.)Growth RatePPP Position
US$29T2%#2
China$26T4.8%#1
Germany$5.5T1.4%#4
India$4.8T6%#3
Japan$4.7T1%#5

Conclusion – Looking Ahead to 2026

As 2025 ends, the economic giants Q4 2025 analysis reveals a reshaped hierarchy. The U.S. remains the nominal leader, China dominates PPP, India rises rapidly, and Germany anchors Europe. Emerging markets add dynamism to the global outlook.

ALSO READ:   Techtools : Apple and Google want to turn your phone into a Covid-tracking machine

Looking ahead to 2026:

  • AI-driven productivity will offset demographic challenges.
  • Green energy transition will redefine industrial competitiveness.
  • Geopolitical risks (trade tensions, regional conflicts) will test resilience.

The economic outlook 2026 suggests a world where power is more distributed, innovation is more global, and competition is more intense.


Discover more from Startups Pro,Inc

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2015-2026 StartUpsPro,Inc . All Rights Reserved

Discover more from Startups Pro,Inc

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading